Test automation your team can actually maintain
We build automation frameworks that run reliably in your pipeline, fail for real reasons, and stay readable long after the first sprint, so your team can release more often without adding manual effort.
Automation that nobody trusts is worse than none
Many teams have tried automation before. The suite grew, tests became flaky, and eventually people stopped paying attention to the results.
- Slow manual regressionEvery release waits on days of repetitive checking by hand.
- Flaky testsIntermittent failures train the team to ignore red builds.
- UI-only coverageEverything is tested through the browser, making suites slow and brittle.
- Automation outside the pipelineTests run occasionally on someone’s machine instead of on every change.
Automation-first, not automation-everything
We start by deciding what should be automated and at which level. Business rules are usually faster and more stable to check through APIs; the browser is reserved for the journeys that genuinely need it.
Frameworks follow clear patterns, generate readable reports, and run in your CI/CD pipeline so every merge gets the same consistent check.
Capabilities
Web automation
Stable browser tests for critical user journeys using modern locator strategies.
API automation
Fast, dependable checks of business logic, contracts and error handling.
Regression automation
Convert repetitive manual regression into suites that run on every build.
Framework development
Well-structured frameworks with reusable components, data handling and reporting.
CI/CD integration
Automated runs in Azure DevOps, GitHub Actions or your existing pipeline.
Selenium
Maintenance, stabilization and extension of existing Selenium suites.
Playwright
Fast, cross-browser automation with built-in tracing for quicker debugging.
Cypress
Developer-friendly component and end-to-end testing for modern front ends.
How we work
Evaluate
Review current coverage, tooling and flakiness; identify automation candidates.
Select levels
Decide what belongs at unit, API and UI level for speed and stability.
Build framework
Create the foundation: structure, test data, configuration and reports.
Integrate
Run suites in CI with clear pass/fail signals and quality gates.
Sustain
Monitor stability, fix flakiness quickly and grow coverage deliberately.
What it means for your business
Technologies we use
- Playwright
- Selenium
- Cypress
- REST Assured
- Postman
- TypeScript
- JavaScript
- Python
- Azure DevOps
- GitHub
- CI/CD
Faster release cycles
Regression that once took days of manual effort runs automatically on every build, so you can ship more often.
Consistent quality checks
Every change is verified the same way, with no skipped steps under deadline pressure.
Freed-up people
Testers spend their time on exploratory and high-judgment work.
Earlier feedback
Developers learn about breaking changes before the code is merged.
Frequently asked questions
Which tool should we use: Playwright, Selenium or Cypress?
It depends on your stack, browsers, team skills and existing investment. We will recommend one with reasons, and we are happy to keep and improve a suite you already have.
How much of our testing should be automated?
Enough to cover stable, high-value and repetitive checks. We rarely recommend automating everything; the goal is fast, reliable feedback, not a coverage number.
Can you fix our flaky test suite?
Yes. We diagnose root causes such as timing, test data and environment issues, stabilize what is valuable and retire what is not.
Will our team be able to maintain it?
That is a design goal. We document conventions, pair with your engineers and hand over a framework built for your team’s skills.
From our Insights
Choosing Between Playwright, Selenium and Cypress in 2026
The right framework is the one your team can reliably maintain and integrate into delivery, not simply the newest one.
Related services
Talk to Qanovix about test automation
Tell us where you are today and what you need to achieve. We will recommend a practical next step, even if it is small.